Spotted: Fake Abortion Clinics in SoCal
Published April 16, 2009 @ 04:36PM PT
Tina Dupuy shares her undercover investigation of Avenues Pregnancy Clinic located in Southern California which professes "to help teens and women who are experiencing unplanned pregnancy situations."
Seems like a good idea, right?
Well, not really.
Check out this story from Tina's friend who went in for a pregnancy test, but instead, got subjected to an anti-abortion exorcism:
Maggie, as we'll call her, is 23 years old. She's what I call a yoga twinkie (not to her face): sweet, open-minded and sometimes naïve. Maggie just moved in with her new boyfriend. It's the first time she's lived with anyone. She's elated, she's in love, and now she's late. Just by a couple of days, but she's worried. Maggie is proudly paying her own way through college. There's a sign in a medical office complex on the way home from her job touting "Free Pregnancy Test."
So she goes. To her relief, her test comes back negative. To her surprise, she's kept in what she describes as a backroom, where several women, dressed as nurses, want to speak with her about her life decisions. Maggie is far too polite to try to leave or question her detention.
The women talk to her about "living in sin." They ask her if she believes in God. Yeah, sure, she tells them, she believes in God (and Allah and Buddha and the Master Cleanse). After two-and-a-half hours the nurses ask Maggie if she would like to give her life to Jesus Christ and pray with them. Maggie is blindsided. All she wanted was to know if she was pregnant.
She leaves with a Bible and an existential crisis. "They were so convincing; they said all this stuff," Maggie tells me, in tears, after her ordeal. "I don't know. Is it wrong that I'm living with Mike?"
Her voice seems earnestly stressed about the answer.
"Tina, do you think I'm going to hell?"
Look I understand that when you go to the doctor, you aren't always going to hear what you want to hear. But can we please remove the "morality" prescriptions within women's health care and get rid of these fake clinics? Here's more background from Tina:
According to their site, Avenues has been "presenting Biblical truth" to women since 1988. And no, this is not Honduras. This is not even Arkansas. This is Los Angeles County.
A 2006 article in The New York Times says there are anywhere from 2,300 to 3,500 of these religious-themed clinics, often referred to as "crisis pregnancy centers," nationwide, compared with around 1,800 abortion providers. Planned Parenthood has 15 clinics in the LA area. LifeCall.org, a pro-life resource Web site, mentions 25 or more centers in the same area.
Typically, as is the case with Avenues, the religious intentions of these clinics-in-name-only aren't publicly displayed on their sign or even on their disclosure forms. They intentionally camouflage themselves to look like medical facilities, following the advice of Robert Pearson, who - after Hawaii decriminalized abortion in 1967 - started the first crisis pregnancy center in Honolulu to combat it. The Pearson Foundation Manual, "How to Start and Operate Your Own Pro-Life Outreach Crisis Pregnancy Center," published in 1984, is still used today as a blueprint. Pearson writes, "Obviously, we're fighting Satan. A killer, who in this case is the girl who wants to kill her baby, has no right to information that will help her kill her baby."
Gahhhh. This. makes. me. so. mad.
Not that fake abortion clinics are anything new, but I just wish society would stop shaking their fists at women's vaginas. Shoving a Bible under our belts isn't going to keep us from getting pregnant. It's not going to change the fact that we are fertile beings, who may, on occasion have an unplanned pregnancy. But it's up to US not YOU to make the choice to wait until we are at the right stage of life - emotionally and financially - to deal with responsibility of child.
From the Feminist Women's Health Center - here are unbiased resources to assist you in deciding what to do with your pregnancy:
- Am I Pregnant? A list of pregnancy symptoms and assistance in evaluating your options
- Pregnancy Options Workbook and website - An honest resource to help you make your own decision.
- Backline - Someone to talk with directly about your options. Toll Free talk line: 888-493-0092
Photo Credit: Aaltra
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Health Care Passed in House, Women Used As Political Poker Chip
-
Pro-Choice Support For Carhart Clinic Prevails In Omaha
-
Friday Femme Fatale: Post-Palin, Gay Boyfriends & PETA Outrage
Comments (69)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Jen Nedeau is a social media consultant, progressive activist, feminist speaker and writer. She currently lives in New York City, where she works full-time as the Director of Digital Strategy at Air America Media. In August 2008, Nedeau was selected to be the Editor of the WomensRights.Change.Org where she facilitates daily discussion about the feminist movement. Additionally, Nedeau volunteers as the Chief Technology Officer for New Leaders Council, a non-profit that offers exclusive training for young leaders. You can follow her on Twitter @HumanFolly or learn more here: www.jennedeau.com.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Those kinds of places are in this Philly area too. They use names like Pregnancy Care Centers, Post-Abortion Counselors, and to further mangle the language, dissing the name of a great band to call such a place Abba. All services that fit under the broad umbrella of social work or counseling have had professional codes, primarily to respect the rights, choices and dignity of all who are served. The 'faith-based' crowd and fake clinics are obviously the opposite of professional standards. But more than the bias, agenda and contempt for democracy and diversity, the fake clinics are major forces of deception. The level of dishonesty even surpasses their false advertising. In case a cultist reads this and asks 'how does he know,' I was a part of a long expose of fake clinics in this area. Since two of us went into them as a couple, they really zoomed in on me as the male in the relationship. One such place was going to offer me legal assistance when they had the impression that I wanted to fight for the fetus. We should have written a book. It was obvious how easily weak and/ or desperate minds could be manipulated by their tactics. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta
Posted by Rev Bookburn on 04/16/2009 @ 09:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree that clinic's tactics were just wrong.
but...
I'm not familiar with fake clinics, and hope you are not refering to all pregnancy centers that are faith based. Because there are some really good ones out there that really help people who decide to continue their pregnancy. Before making a decision sometimes people need to hear both sides.
The real root of the pro-life vs Pro-choice debate: Is it a baby or not?
I respect the belief that it's not a baby yet. Sometimes it's hard for me...I just pray that no pain was involved when the baby was removed, because I beleive they went straight to heaven.
But I often feel the lack of respect for my beliefs.
I am consistently pro-life, which means I'm against forcing the mother to die if the only option is to abort (which is very rare due to advancment in medical technology). I also believe that it is a human responsibility to make sure all children are taken care of. (I'm also against the death penatly but that's kinda off-topic).
So, as someone who truly just wants to protect someone I believe exists, it's hard to take when people just catagorize me as anti-woman or religious fanatic.
I'm just a bleeding-heart christian liberal :)
Posted by Sarah Eaton on 04/17/2009 @ 01:36PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I couldn't disagree with you more. The root of the debate is not whether it's a baby or not. The root of the debate is who has control over a woman's body. There is no one in this debate who is pro-abortion or anti-life. The sides are pro-choice or anti-choice. It absolutely drives me crazy when the anti-choice call themselves pro-life. It shows a complete lack of thought about the actual issue and what it is you're supposed to be fighting for. Imagine how many fewer abortions would be needed if you all spent your efforts on giving women MORE choices instead of taking them away.
Posted by Michael Owens on 04/18/2009 @ 05:30PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sarah, if you go to a real clinic, such as Planned Parenthood, they WILL give you both sides and all the facts. I walked in to my local Planned Parenthood and specifically asked for information about getting an abortion, because I had fully made up my mind before walking into the clinic. The nurse took me into a counseling room, and even though I told her I had already made up my mind and I was going to terminate the pregnancy, that I had all the information I needed and I had weighed my options and made the best decision for me, she still told me about the government services available to single mothers and about adoption services, and provided me with pamphlets with information on these things.
Planned Parenthood is a real clinic, with real doctors and nurses, and they DO provide both sides of the issue. These fake clinics lie to women, either by flat-out lying to them, or by witholding critical information.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/20/2009 @ 08:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Okay-- Now I remember why I signed up for this site. I'm the only opening liberal Christian I know. Thanks for letting me know I'm not alone.
Posted by D H on 04/21/2009 @ 03:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
D H, you are not alone! There are plenty of us liberal Christians out here.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/21/2009 @ 06:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree with Sarah. Okay even though I am pro choice I often cringe at the thought that its okay to terminate a pregency just because your irresponsible. Look I am twenty seven years old NEVER BEEN PREGANT AND I probly wont ever have an abortion. But sometimes I just think that society has made it okay to be irresponsible and throw away your baby. Also what these abortion clinics don't tell you that you is that it will leave emotional scars for both the mother of the baby and the father of the baby. I have seen both men and women affected by abortion in a negative way. It may be easy for the writer to say ooooh its a womans choice but until you have the opportunity to See a room full of dead babies, or see an newborn die or a premature baby die maybe that will change your perspective. Yes I do believe IN CHOICE but I don't Believe in carelessness. Now your friend lets talk about how the responsible thing to do would be to BEFORE she moves in with her boyfriend to go to the gyncologist and get on a comprehensive birthcontrol plan that works for them so that she wouldn't have these scares. Also if more women were proactive about their reproductive health then we wouldn't have as many abortions. Also if your wondering what I do for a Living I am a Registered Nurse and I currently work in Labor and Delivery, postpartum, and I have worked in pediatrics. So I think I am qualified to speak on abortion issues.
Posted by Christina Sampson on 04/17/2009 @ 06:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree with Christina. One of the reasons schools need to be more educated regarding contraception and the women need to take charge of her body to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. I am Catholic but a moderate one. I used to believe that abortion was okay, but now as a mother, I am not so sure anymore :(
Posted by NOCIRC-FL Enith Hernandez on 04/17/2009 @ 10:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"I often cringe at the thought that its okay to terminate a pregency just because your irresponsible."
If they were irresponsible enough to get pregnant, imagine how irresponsible they would be as a parent.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/18/2009 @ 05:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Christina,
You are making a big assumption saying unplanned pregnancies are the result of the woman being irresponsible. What about rape? What about broken condoms? What about medication that interferes with your birth control? There are too many factors to consider.
I'm 31 now, but when I was 20, although I was pro-choice I always thought if I were faced with an unplanned pregnancy I would not abort, because I had a family that would provide the financial resources to help out. Then I got pregnant.
Sure, there are women who have emotional repercussions to terminating a pregnancy. But there are hundreds more who are happy they made that decision, for themselves and that potential child. I am one of them. Chances are you have met several of them -- we just don't walk around with a big tattoo on our foreheads saying "I had an abortion and I'm fine."
Also, how many more women are scarred by having a child they did not want? Do you think our society allows a woman to say "I had a kid and I regret it"? Nobody says those words, but if you look at the number of children who are abused and neglected, you can see it.
This issue is not simple, and there is no right answer or quick fix. The best we can do is let each woman make the choice for herself, and the best way for her to do that is by giving her all the necessary information, not lying to her, witholding information or guilting her into yuor decision.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/20/2009 @ 08:14AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Criss you are wrong in about every aspect except the rape.if a condom breaks guess what?? you were still having sex and a condom box will say it is not 100% effective.along with birth control.if you don't want a kid then don't have sex.its a risk every time no matter what.you cant afford your baby?(which doesn't make sense because govt programs pay for just about everything)and having an abortion costs money too! that's a terrible excuse.and last but not least.ADOPTION! I'm sure there are a lot of loving parents who would love to adopt a child who cant have one of their own.is that not an option because you are afraid when the child grows up he/she might try to find you for an explanation?it disgusts me that anyone would want to kill a child because the simple fact they aren't ready or financially stable or whatever stupid reasons.believe me i understand if you were raped or any unfortunate reason i didn't mention.but other than that abortion is wrong in every aspect.don't take away a child's life because you cant take care of your own.
Posted by cody lee on 04/21/2009 @ 12:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Cody,
I wish life were that simple. Really, I do.
I wish there were enough parents out there waiting to adopt all the children waiting to be adopted. Especially those who are no longer newborns, or those who are mixed-race or minorities, or those who have special needs.
I wish people understood that children should NEVER be a PUNISHMENT for "being irresponsible" and allowing a condom to break.
First of all, I'm curious as to why a fetus conceived through rape is different than a fetus conceived through any other form of intercourse. (I also want to examine your definition of rape, because I will bet you anything it is not wide enough to emcompass all the different forms and degrees of rape. But that's another blog post.)
Adoption is not the duct tape to this problem, and if you think it is then you undestand very little about pregnancy, women, and the adoption system. One of the biggest problems with adoption is that THE WOMAN MUST STILL CARRY THE PREGNANCY TO TERM. Her life and her rights and her health are still infringed upon. I have always known that there is no way in h3ll that I could even give a baby up for adoption, not because of the stupid idiotic reason you suggested, but because I understand what pregnancy is, and, more importantly, I know what I don't know about pregnancy. I know there is no way I could carry that pregnancy to term, feel that fetus inside of me, and then walk away from it. I also know that adoption has a huge price tag for the child, as well.
I would also urge you to educate yourself about the government assistance programs out there. Yes, they help -- for the first year. Guess what! The baby still has needs after that first year. My sister is a single mother (she and the father were in a stable relationship, they were married, but he turned out to be an addict and now is sporadically involved in his daughter's life -- and that's me being VERY GRACIOUS -- and doesn't pay child support, even though my sister taken him to court on this issue REPEATEDLY. Do you want me to give you the gory details of her fights with the government to get her benefits? (PS: she was on the pill when she got pregnant. In case you were wondering.)
I know it's easy for you to dismiss this issue and over-simplify it to make your conscience/agenda happy, because YOU will never see yourself in this situation. You will never be pregnant, no matter how hard you try. Perhaps this is why you are so ignorant on the raelities of this issue; it will never affect you.
And, by the way, how many children have you adopted? (Just curious.)
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/21/2009 @ 12:30PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Cody, lets turn the tables for a minute. How about if you don't agree with abortion, don't have one.
Not your body? Not your choice. Not your ball of cells growing inside your body? Not your choice to remove it or keep it. Children are NOT being killed, a child is alive, a child can exist outside of my body, these are things that an embryo cannot do.
I would rather an abortion be performed than another child to be born into this world that is not wanted, cannot be taken care of and runs a higher risk of abuse. There are over 500,000 children alone in the United States that are in foster care. How many live with you? If you think adoption is the option then step up and do your part. If you want to force women to have children they dont want then you had better be prepared to be there to pick up the slack and take over when she realizes she's not ready to be a parent. Otherwise, zip it. I've LIVED the reality of a foster child, and I can tell you its no cake walk when the kid comes to you half crazed because his mother was a drug addict who didnt give a crap about him and should have never have him to begin with.
You have say over your body, not mine, not Mary's, not Cindy's not Jane Doe's-YOURS. No one is going to force you to have an abortion so don't you dare try to tell another woman what she can or can not do with her body or one day it might be you who has her rights stripped away.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/21/2009 @ 02:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yeah, men, and religous nuts, need to respect women's sexual rights! Men don't have vaginas, and although society and media lean towards pleasing men, they need to realize they're the idiots making women pregnant who can't afford or don't want a child! Also, these religous nuts need to move towards living in the present day, not thousands of years ago!
Posted by M F on 04/18/2009 @ 03:28AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
abortion is killing. Sure it can be llegal but If a woman wants an abortion she should do it herself! we still talking about religion? Its about life. Its not anybodys right to decided when to end a human life. You can choice to have sex or not. But not to let the life inside you live or not. You already made that choice when you chose to have sex. So thats a yes or no question. There are many way to expresses love responsibly...
Until this idea is understood there will be fear and hate in the world. Abortion is a choice of fear, and an unwillingness to face your decisions directly. Do not underestimate the power of your thoughts and decisions, they are as influencial as as your actions. So are you ProLove or ProFear?
Posted by Hans Mickelson on 04/20/2009 @ 05:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
im sorry if i am confused but when you have an abortion doesnt that mean you dont want the child??
Posted by cody lee on 04/21/2009 @ 11:37AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Pretend ignorance only shows one to be doubly ignorant. Of course, as you know, Matthew was talking about actual children not being wanted or being financially abandoned by the fathers. He was not referring to the mere potential for a child which might be aborted by the only person in the world who has the right to make that decision: the mother. No one else has any right to tell a woman she must allow a pregnancy to continue.
Posted by B. Allan Ross on 04/22/2009 @ 12:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hans, does rape never happen in this pretty little world where everyone *chooses* to have sex? Oh thats right, its very easy for those who've never had to face that possibility when they walk to their car alone in a dark parking garage to forget that rape exists, isn't it?
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/24/2009 @ 06:42PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hans,
If I have a root canal, I'm killing the tooth (it has nerve endings!) So, if I want one should I have to perform the root canal on myself?
Which other medical procedures should women perform on themselves because you happen to not like them? What about removing a tumor -- should I operate on myself if I want the tumor removed, as well? It's a multiplying mass of cells, same as a fetus. God gave me the tumor, so removing it would be going against His will... wouldn't it?
There is fear and hate in the world because one group of people insists on oppressing and controling another group of people. One group is imposing its views and beliefs on another world, like you are doing right now.
You believe the fetus is a human. I, and the scientific community, do not agree with you. Yet you insist on imposing your personal beliefs and views on me and my body. You are oppressing me and all women who think like me (there are many of us).
I am ProLove. I do not want women to live in fear. I want women to know they have choices, and that they have control over their own lives.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/24/2009 @ 09:51PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Like the woman Maggie in the story above, I too went to a pregnancy center in 1987 to get a free pregnancy test. I had been with my baby's father for 3 years but were not married because of other circumstances which had just cleared when I found out I was pregnant. We later married.
I was shocked to be forced to watch an anti-abortion video before the staff would give me the results of the pregnancy test. They ensured I would not abort the pregnancy before giving me the results.
Fast forward 20+ years and my daughter gave birth two weeks ago to a child. We had an adoptive family picked out, but the adoptive mother found out she was pregnant and put her adoption plans on hold. My daughter decided to keep her baby. She had always wanted to keep her baby, but she is 19, no college, no job, special needs, developmentally delayed, etc.
So, here we have a less than 2 week old child in the hands of a child. Somehow this does not seem like the best circumstances either. There is no way she is giving her child to anyone she has not approved and any adoption will be an open adoption. Even though she realizes she may not be the best parent at this point, she is not going to play roulette with his life and give him to just anyone.
I just wish the religious zealots would stop playing morality with other people's lives and give them the help they need without first making the person asking for help conform to their rules. Why can't we just love people and give them the help they need without first making them admit any wrong doing? Life is perfect in any way it happens and does not need to confirm to any ancient text. Please help these young women and not condemn their lives.
Posted by Roxanne Fucci on 04/18/2009 @ 07:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What upsets me is the idea that just because you're pregnant, or don't want to be pregnant, that this should be an open door for religious zealots to swoop in. Scary.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/18/2009 @ 08:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Most people that do go through the ordeal of having an abortion don't have multiple abortions, and they have good reasons for having one. I don't think that the average abortion is a 3rd trimester abortion either. Even pro abortionists are usually against 3rd trimester abortions.
Anyway, my biggest argument against against pro lifers is Octo-Mom. I understand why she had all of those babies inspite of the fact that she already had 6 kids. Her belief was that ALL of those fetuses were lifes. So acording to the pro-life belief what she did was right..........right?
Posted by Lorena W. on 04/18/2009 @ 08:55AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm glad to see that people feel comfortable enough here to express their pro-life beliefs, and that no one has attacked them. I've come to really feel empathy for the passion of pro-lifers, and I believe that many of them are sincere in their desire to protect innocent life.
What bothers me is that, as a community fundraiser for organizations that provide services to child victims of abuse, sexual assault, and neglect, I can see the massive difference between all of the people in the community who claim to be "pro-life" and want to "protect innocent children," and the actual number who actually provide financial support for these children after they are born.
Trust me, I've lived in a number of states and done this for many years in many communities. The difference is always there. Churches will always support anti-abortion groups, lobbyists, literature, these pregnancy crisis clinics, etc.
But stage a fundraiser and ask for their actual support of abused children, and the turn out is starkly less. Same story with adoption of inner city/minority kids.
What it has made me realize is this: it's one thing to have an emotional reaction to the "thought" of someone else's child. It is something else entirely, apparently, to put one's money where one's mouth is and provide real support.
And that makes sense! Why should you get your own life and money involved in some other woman's business? Well, that's the whole point. In the end, you shouldn't. Unless you are willing to walk the walk, provide support, and inject yourself into some stranger's life, you really can not claim to have the right to make her decisions for her. And even if you WERE willing to do all that, do you really have the right to pick a perfect stranger? Without her permission? Just because she had sex at some point in time that YOU would not have?
Can you see that the abortion debate is taking place ONLY because we, as a society, have all collectively said "It's O.K." to weigh in on women's sexual activity? We rarely say anything so extreme as "Men should not have sex," it's only women's sexuality that we feel so comfortable armchair quarterbacking.
I have yet to encounter one single pro-life individual who did not admit that, in the end, they believe abortion is wrong because it makes sexual activity "too easy" for women. Every single person I have ever questioned, at some point, admits that they feel justified in judging a woman's decision to "spread her legs." What this translates to is a belief that "babies are God's punishment for having sex."
This kind of mentality does NOT protect children. It may force them to be born, but it is a backwards, irresponsible, medieval belief system. Rather than result in a society that values children, it results in a society that marginalizes them. People feel justified in passing judgment on these children, once born, just like they passed judgment on the women.
Definition of Fetus - "a sacred, holy, supernatural being who must be defended even by perfect strangers."
Definition of Illegitimate Child - "A useless drain on society whose mothers should not be rewarded for their irresponsibility. Let them all suffer."
Need some proof? See this article about Sen. Dave Schultheis' (a pro-life Christian) statements about pregnant women and his degree of concern for their unborn children:
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/25/schultheis-hiv/
Posted by Arcadia B on 04/18/2009 @ 05:52PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I did not intend to come across as pro life, as I am pro choice. I have learned over the last 8 months that pro choice means just that, letting my 19 year old choose to keep her baby. My initial conversation with her surrounded abortion. She insisted she made this mistake, she would make it work, understanding it would not be easy. She did seek out an abortion after the baby's father broke up with her, but she must have been a day or two late. It was after that we pursued adoption.
Well, here we are, the little guy is 2 weeks old tomorrow. I was with her until last Friday. Last night on the phone she was again talking about adoption.
It's not easy and I'm not in a position to help her right now. I'm self employed in an industry that was hit hard by the downturn. In fact I've only been in the business for 4 years so I do not have savings to fall back on.
I totally agree with Arcadia, these young women need help and not be chastised for their mistakes. Furthermore these babies are the ones suffering. Thank God my daughter is in a school system that is helping her to become a good mother.
Posted by Roxanne Fucci on 04/20/2009 @ 07:49AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Roxanne, thanks for sharing your story. You hit the heart of the matter: pro-choice means having options open to you be them keeping the baby, adopting or even abortion. I can't speak for every pro-choice person obviously, I can only speak for myself. I am not pro-abortion and I know that I could never chose abortion for myself BUT it is not my place to tell someone else what to do.
I repsect & admire you & your daughter for her choice to have the baby. She is a young adult now, and fully capable of making this kind of decision. I hope that the adoption works for her, and if not, I wish her nothing but the best.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/20/2009 @ 08:04AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Arcadia, thank you for bringing up a very important point -- what happens to all those unwanted, unaborted babies? Radical pro-lifers care about the fetus and call it a baby, but as soon as it becomes and actual baby, they leave it lying in the gutter.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/20/2009 @ 08:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
My sentiments exactly! It always seems like the pro-choicers are the ones actually helping the fetusis when they become human beings.
Posted by withrow newell on 04/20/2009 @ 12:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This has got to be the best post on this subject I have ever read. It reflects exactly how I feel and my own experiences.
Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 04/22/2009 @ 12:31AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Your post really is awesome. I love, "Can you see that the abortion debate is taking place ONLY because we, as a society, have all collectively said "It's O.K." to weigh in on women's sexual activity?"
I firmly have come to realize, after the global warming crisis is settled, if ever, then there will be a water scarcity or something horrible as a result of increasing population. The solution (aside from the Illuminati Republicans who want to kill everyone that does slave or give to their corporate welfare and eliminate billions of people):
The solution is women's rights!!!!!
The solution is women being encouraged to participate in sports, like football and Ju Jitsu, so they can defend themselves against sexual predators. Women need to be giving equal employment opportunities and pay, (still not quite there yet,) we only receive 78cents to every dollar a man makes in this country. We need to be given equal opportunities to education and encouraged in math and science, a place we are often discouraged. Women who can kick ass and are busy in school or their careers are not usually the ones having abortions.
ANYONE HERE, DESPITE THEIR OWN BELIEF ON ABORTION, NEEDS TO LEAVE THAT CHOICE AVAILABLE BECAUSE IT IS A WOMAN'S RIGHT. Not only do we have food crisis, earth catastrophe crisis, we also have more SLAVES in the world right now, than any other time in human history! This increase is proportionate to the population growth, and the average price for a slave is $90. Can you imagine a ten year old girl being bought for domestic and sex work for $50 for her whole body and life until someone wants to throw her away, in NY? acrimesomonstrous.com and freetheslaves.net and castla.org
Lastly, I am apalled that their could be Fake Abortion Clinics!!! That should be illegal. Those nuns should be sued for mental abuse, misrepresentation, false advertising, soliciting, or more. That should not be allowed, Liberal Christians should be embarrassed and appalled. Force Feeding religion down a young girl who wanted a pregnancy test is shameful and thus, I will never join any denomination despite a shared love for GOD!
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/22/2009 @ 04:23PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree Arcadia - "Unless you are willing to walk the walk, provide support, and inject yourself into some stranger's life, you really can not claim to have the right to make her decisions for her. "
Obviously no one WANTS to have an abortion. It's not something that is used as "birth control" but can determine whether or not a life can be cared for in a responsible way once it is brought into this world.
Posted by Jen Nedeau on 04/19/2009 @ 09:45AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
When my girlfriend was going through her divorce she had started seeing social services counselors, marriage and mental health about three years before her escape.
The cross dressing husband became born again and obtained a Christian Crusader. In Virginia this crusader had the judge order my girlfriend to see a Christian counselor, dismissing that my girlfriend had mentioned that they had years of counseling. I dropped her off, expecting an hour visit or so, a few minutes later she came back out - they had started preaching Christian junk at her, telling her to go back to the abuser.
What was interesting was that her attorney at the time, just rolled over, did not reinforce that she had seen counselors. In fact this attorney did not bother to contact them, allowed records to be accessed that skipped the period of cohabitation and assaults and we found out was running for political office as a "Conservative".
Separation of Church and State is a lie in Virginia....
Posted by jowey styxx on 04/20/2009 @ 05:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I firmly believe in a woman's right to choose. That choice should be respected because it's no one's business!! The thought of a religious zealot screaming her views at a very sensitive time in a woman's life, irks me to know end.
All I want know is "where the hell are the RIGHT TO LIFERS when the food stamps run out"???? Who's there when little Johnnie is diagnosed with Autism?? Where are the child support checks when "baby-daddy" decides "he's not ready for a kid??
Everyone is so quick to point their fingers at single mothers and teen-ages, when it's actually married couples, who seek alternatives to pregnancy.
If this country would get its head out of the Dark Ages and teach Sex Education, maybe there wouldn't be so many unwanted pregnancies.
Why is Sex Education such a TABOO in the USA? We tout ourselves as being a Christian Nation but I personally don't buy into the HYPE. After reading the comments on this blog, I am prone to believe We are still a Nation of Hypocrites.
Posted by leatrice brantley on 04/20/2009 @ 06:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
QUOTE:
All I want know is "where the hell are the RIGHT TO LIFERS when the food stamps run out"???? Who's there when little Johnnie is diagnosed with Autism?? Where are the child support checks when "baby-daddy" decides "he's not ready for a kid??
Yes, and how many people complain about the welfare system & single moms "having more babies". Um... thank you Leatrice! This nation is decidedly un-Christian when it comes to actually lending a hand to the needy.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/20/2009 @ 07:06PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That is why there is adoption available. I think that giving a woman the choice to kill her child is a cop out. Then women who choose not to be responsible, know that if they do get pregnant they can just get an abortion. I was just reading up on the possibility of getting pregnant while on an IUD, and it is very common. I then read the comments below the article from women who had experienced this. One comment was from a girl who had five different abortions and was pregnant again.. and the doctors told her they wouldn't perform anymore abortions on her, and she said "Now I am stuck with a baby I don't want". That is absolutly tragic. Tragic that she knew she had a tendency to get pregnant while on birth control, and instead of taking more precaution not to get pregnant (like not having sex, or using double protection ie. a condom with IUD) she just thought she could continue to get abortions the rest of her life. If you don't give a woman that option, then she will be forced to be more careful or deal with her consiquesces. My Daughter was born at 31 weeks, and I saw how she fought to be here. She cryed when she was delivered and it breaks my heart to think of all the devistated parents who are unable to have children, and all of these babies being murdered. I went into planned parenthood to get a pregnancy test just to confirm my pregnancy (took a home test and it was positive) and when the lady came in and told me I was pregnant she asked me if I was planning on keeping it and I said yes right away. She said well here, this is in case you change your mind.. and she handed me a large packet of places who perform abortions?? Why did she feel that was necessary if I told her I was sure I was not going to kill my baby??
About Lorena W.'s comment: Octo-Mom should have been adopting 8 children (and the 6 before). That is another problem. Maybe God had a different plan for her, but that is a whole other issue.
How many of you pro-choicers have read or seen pictures and or stories reguarding abortion. If that doesn't jab you in the heart and make you seriously upset, then I just have nothing else to say.
Take a look at these horrible botched abortion stories, and plenty more where they came from.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/21/2009 @ 09:36PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That is why there is adoption available. I think that giving a woman the choice to kill her child is a cop out. Then women who choose not to be responsible, know that if they do get pregnant they can just get an abortion. I was just reading up on the possibility of getting pregnant while on an IUD, and it is very common. I then read the comments below the article from women who had experienced this. One comment was from a girl who had five different abortions and was pregnant again.. and the doctors told her they wouldn't perform anymore abortions on her, and she said "Now I am stuck with a baby I don't want". That is absolutely tragic. Tragic that she knew she had a tendency to get pregnant while on birth control, and instead of taking more precaution not to get pregnant (like not having sex, or using double protection ie. a condom with IUD) she just thought she could continue to get abortions the rest of her life. If you don't give a woman that option, then she will be forced to be more careful or deal with her consequences. My Daughter was born at 31 weeks, and I saw how she fought to be here. She cried when she was delivered and it breaks my heart to think of all the devastated parents who are unable to have children, and all of these babies being murdered. I went into planned parenthood to get a pregnancy test just to confirm my pregnancy (took a home test and it was positive) and when the lady came in and told me I was pregnant she asked me if I was planning on keeping it and I said yes right away. She said well here, this is in case you change your mind.. and she handed me a large packet of places who perform abortions?? Why did she feel that was necessary if I told her I was sure I was not going to kill my baby??
About Lorena W.'s comment: Octo-Mom should have been adopting 8 children (and the 6 before). That is another problem. Maybe God had a different plan for her, but that is a whole other issue.
How many of you pro-choicers have read or seen pictures and or stories regarding abortion. If that doesn't jab you in the heart and make you seriously upset, then I just have nothing else to say.
Take a look at these horrible botched abortion stories, and plenty more where they came from.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/21/2009 @ 09:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Adoption would be great if it didn't require the woman to carry the pregnancy to term. Read my comment in response to Cody's rant about why adoption was never an option for me.
It's also not a perfect solution for the child, either. There are so many children in our foster/adoption systems already who are not being adopted. Why do we want to add to that? Adoption is not as perfect a solution as anti-choicers want it to be. It has serious emotional consequences for the woman and the abandoned child (as well as our child welfare system and government finances).
I'll bet the packet you received from PP had information about ALL the options available to you, including adoption and abortion.
Jessica, it sounds like you've heard a lot of horror stories, some of which may or may not be true. I've heard and seen many real stories. I know several women who have had abortions, and I bet you do too -- even if you don't know they's had an abortion. Statistics show one in three women has had an abortion -- a safe, legal, non-"botched" abortion. I can show you "horrible botched" stories for any medical procedure out there, just give me time to do a quick Internet search. Does that mean we should stop letting people have surgery?
"How many of you pro-choicers have read or seen pictures and or stories regarding abortion[?]" I have seen, read, heard, experiences these stories. I have lived them. I am well informed on the subject, which is why I'm so vocal about it.
I also know much worse stories of child abuse, neglect, and murder. I have seen what happens to those unwanted pregnancies once they become babies and grow into children. The baby doesn't disappear once it comes out of the uterus or after you drop it off at the church/fire station. At that point, you are talking about a human being -- two, actually. The child and the woman who has to either raise that child when she's not ready or able, for a wide range of reasons, or live knowing she abandoned her child.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/22/2009 @ 08:38AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2006-10-26/news/in-the-bag/full
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/21/2009 @ 09:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Again with it being the sole responsibility of the woman to either abstain from sex or find iron clad birth control.
Sexuality is a normal part of the human experience, be you male or female. Perhaps shifting our perceptions about sex (which means acknowledging that it is ok for women to participate & enjoy it) will also shift our perceptions about male/female responsibility toward birth control as well.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/21/2009 @ 09:51PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I didn't say it wasn't ok for women to enjoy sex, however men are not the ones who become pregnant (technically speaking) and are certainly not the ones getting the abortions. What about a man who wants to keep the baby and the woman does not? Does the man have no rights to his child? I mean, women know the possible results of having sex and that is pregnancy and/or STDs; just like men know the results as well. If a woman is dead set that she does NOT want kids, then she should take every precautionary measure possible to prevent that because it is her body and her life that will change if she becomes pregnant. I am sure some women would still become pregnant, but they always have the option of adoption. I believe if there is a will, there is a way and God will always provide for you. You may not be rich, but you will eat and survive.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/21/2009 @ 11:13PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"What about a man who wants to keep the baby and the woman does not? Does the man have no rights to his child?"
If he feels so strongly about it, then he should have had this discussion with the woman BEFORE having sex with her. If they did not agree on what to do if she were to get pregnant, then HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT IT IN HIS PANTS.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/22/2009 @ 07:05AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have seen, read, heard, experiences these stories. I have lived them. I am well informed on the subject, which is why I'm so vocal about it.-- Are you serious?! I can't believe.. I mean I have nothing to say. If you have seen those heart retching pictures and you have nothing to say, you still think it is perfectly fine.. WOW!
Adoption would be great if it didn't require the woman to carry the pregnancy to term. Read my comment in response to Cody's rant about why adoption was never an option for me.-- What a horrible excuse as for why abortion is ok! Oh I just don't want to have my body change so I will just kill my baby. Wow, how pathetic and selfish.
If he feels so strongly about it, then he should have had this discussion with the woman BEFORE having sex with her. If they did not agree on what to do if she were to get pregnant, then HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT IT IN HIS PANTS.-- NOOO, if the WOMAN felt so strongly she should have kept her legs closed! The man knows he will not get pregnant, but the woman knows she could. If the woman is not in a steady, stable relationship with the man, she is the one who needs to worry about it. If she is just having a "friends with benefits" relationship, then SHE should ask the man what they would do if SHE were to become pregnant. If the man says.. good luck to YOU, then she shouldn't be having sex with someone like that or she will be dealing with the baby by herself. When I was in that type of relationship, I made darn sure I did everything I could to make sure I didn't get pregnant, and hey I didn't because I was responsible with taking birth control daily as directed and I made the guy were a condom. Simple, just some are too lazy to make sure they won't get pregnant. And had I become pregnant, I certainly would have kept my child and not killed him or her just because I wasn't ready. If I wasn't ready, I wouldn't have had sex, period.
People like to play women as the victum all the time, like it is always men persuing sex and THAT is bull. There are lots of women who initiate sex first, so it is not just always the men pushing the sex. A baby is a baby. A sperm alone is not a baby, and an egg alone is not a baby.. but put the 2 together and you get..... A BABY! No matter how small, it is still a baby. The minute the sprem and egg combine, that is a baby. Just like a chicken, if the egg is fertilized, you get a chicken. If not, you just have the egg.
Every abortion is a horror story. Just imagine what that poor, sweet child was thinking before his legs were sucked off and he was torn to pieces. Or what he was thinking as the saline solution enters the womb and begins to burn his delicate skin, as he fights for his life (as intelligent as he is already), trying to get away from it. Or worse yet, the baby doesn't die and they must try another method to KILL him.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/22/2009 @ 10:14AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That just sounds so ignorant.
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/22/2009 @ 03:57PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"... Just imagine what that poor, sweet child was thinking before his legs were sucked off and he was torn to pieces. Or what he was thinking as the saline solution enters the womb and begins to burn his delicate skin, as he fights for his life (as intelligent as he is already), trying to get away from it. Or worse yet, the baby doesn't die and they must try another method to KILL him."
Are you serious? Really serious? If so you need to take high school biology again.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/22/2009 @ 06:29PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jessica,
You are missing the point so hugely I know there is no point in addressing your "rebuttals." You've been fed lies and propaganda and you have gobbled it all up.
The reason I could never carry a pregnancy to term and then give the child away has NOTHING to do with my body changing. I never even mentioned that. It has to do with the emotional and psychological implications of the act, mainly for me but also for the abandoned child. I admire women who choose to give their baby up for adoption, because I know I am not strong enough to do something like that. I cannot bring a life into this world and walk away from it.
I am pro-choice. I am on birth control and take precautions to not get pregnant. Once, I screwed up, and got pregnant. And I had an abortion.
If the guy I was with wanted "parental rights" and wanted to have a say in whether I terminated the pregnancy or not, then he should have had that discussion with me BEFORE having sex with me. It is not MY responsibility to watch out for HIS beliefs. (Or yours, for that matter.) Based on your rebuttal, you completely missed the point I was making, and launched into an anti-woman campaign again blaming the woman for getting pregnant and making it all her fault. Yes, women initiate sex. BECAUSE IT'S OKAY FOR WOMEN TO LIKE SEX. And it's okay for women to use birth control to avoid pregnancy, and it's also okay for them to have an abortion if it has to come to that.
Stop blindly accepting the propaganda and do some real research. Get the facts on adoption rates, and also get some real info on birth control effectiveness rates (the info you presented in your first post regarding IUDs is extremely improbable, which makes me seriously doubt the rest of the information you presented.)
You're probably going to go on another irrational, misogynistic tirade in response to this. I'll do my best to ignore it, because talking to walls is highly unproductive and raises my blood pressure too much.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/23/2009 @ 08:08AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Getting pregnant on an IUD is not "very common" Jessica, in fact, the pregnancy rate is comparable to being on a hormone pill. Having an IUD I can tell you I did A LOT of research on the effectiveness and had a very long discussion with my doctor about it. One risk that is increased w/an IUD is tubal pregnancies.
I have a child. I have been pregnant. I agree with Criss - I could never have carried a baby to term only to give it up for adoption. That's me, I don't abandon people.
The first few months of a pregnancy, though, are precarious as our bodies fight to kill and/or keep the blastocyst alive. How many pregnancies go unnoticed because our bodies kill them off before we even miss a period? And I'm not talking only about women on birth control.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/23/2009 @ 08:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
YES, I am dead serious. You need to read up on recent research.
http://www.birthpsychology.com/lifebefore/early3.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1566772,00.html
http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/17/do-aborted-babies-feel-pain/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576814/Babies-feel-pain-before-24-week-abortion-limit.html
Giving a baby anestisia before killing him so he can't feel the pain?! If you people still think this is perfectly OK, then I certainly know where you will be heading after your death. To bad your mothers didn't get abortions.. right?
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/22/2009 @ 07:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ha ha! We know that they are developing their senses and that they are developing their nerve endings in the womb. You are mistaking this natural part of fetal development with some ill intended genocide and it is NOT. I have two children, I am sure the labor pains were much worse than any pre-developed termination would be. My children would probably be even happier and definately have more opportunities if I had waited to be more situated in my life.
Fish feel more intense pain than us and have very developed nerve endings and yet you likely support the slaughter by eating them. I am for the most part vegan. I do not support the slaughter of full grown animals, baby animals, or the nutrition sucking and shortened life span of cows who are hooked up to breast pumps 24/7 until they die. I wouldn't be surprised if you or your family members ate meat, fish, milk etc.
Suppose you argue that you and your family have the right to live and therefore the right to eat animals and support their torture. I would say that your right to live life and kill thousands of animals and pollute by consuming energy for YOUR LIFE SPAN IS NO MORE important than another woman's life or right to not have a mental, physical, emotional, financial responsibility and burden for the rest of her life as well as the child that may be an at risk youth. Being born into poverty and being unwanted is far worse a choice than is the TWO lives you may save by non-judgmentally allowing abortion.
You are not at all considering the grown woman's life. Where you are heading after death. . .don't bring religion into this. The fact that you think a nickel size fetus is more worth fighting for and arguing about than a young woman's life or that of fish's life, then it shows little of how caring you are about this life. Did you adopt? Are you going to adopt? Are you going to help stop human trafficking? Are you going to save someones life outside your family TODAY? Don't advocate troubled women bringing more lives in the world that will need to be saved.
This is an issue of women's rights! In countries where abortion is not taboo, the rate of abortion is much less. Haven't you seen the forced pregnancies in other countries where the women carrying the child did not care about themselves and the child inside them and there are orphananges filled with handicapped, deformed children that no one wants? If you cannot worry about women getting education, physical fitness and equal pay, then stay out of abortion issues, because this is VERY minor in comparison to the problems that result from poverty, food and water scarcity, human trafficking(slaves) and sexual assault.
Though your intent may be noble, you are essentially serving to degrade women and the integrity of women and that is exactly why you are ignorant.
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/22/2009 @ 09:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jess, I could pull out articles that say the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real. I could show you articles that say Obama is the anti-christ. I could show you articles that say the world is going to end tomorrow. Doesn't mean its true.
A fetus doesn't think. The brain is not developed, the organs are not developed, the nerve endings are not developed. There are not a million 1 inch fetuses screaming "mommy why!?" like you would have us believe.
I'll say it again, if you don't agree with abortion, don't have one-it's that simple.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/23/2009 @ 04:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jessica,
There is no denying that an abortion is a very sad and tragic circumstance. I'm sorry that the young woman you mentioned earlier took such a cavalier attitude about using abortions as a form of birth control. But most women don't. That story does not describe the reasons the vast majority of women choose an abortion.
The bigger question is the one I posed earlier. Why do we feel we have the right to sit in judgment of some stranger's decisions? No one can possibly know exactly what every single pregnant woman is going through, what her exact circumstances are, what she is thinking or feeling. Your statements indicate a clear tendancy to believe what you want to believe about other women's behaviors and more importantly -- EXACTLY WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY, in order to have made decisions more like yours.
This is known as "judgmentalism." Not coincidentally, it sounds as though you have strong religious beliefs, which is fine, but you have to be able to accept that other people in the world -- other women, even pregnant women -- do not have to share those beliefs with you. All of our laws and our society exists to protect all of us, whether we share your religion or not.
The very real and gory details of an abortion procedure do not mitigate the fact that every pregnant woman still has the right to decide whether or not she wants to give birth to an unwanted child. And what about women and young girls who are raped? Don't they have the right to the integrity of their own bodies, and to not be relegated to the status of a breeding cow?
What some people here have tried to explain is that there are many, many ways in this world in which women and sometimes VERY young children suffer incredibly because of someone's (usually a man's) selfish and destructive sexual desires. Women and children are raped, genitally mutilated, gang raped, tortured, butchered, sold as slaves, and married off to pedophiles. If you saw pictures of what happens to these little boys and girls, you would be better able to put your abortion pictures into perspective.
It is not that pro-choice women are somehow blind to the existence of the gory details of abortion; it is more true that these women are too well aware of the full extent of children's suffering in the world and have come to realize that there exists a direct correlation -- a bee-line, as it were -- to the status of women in society and their FULL equality. Which means their right to decide when, how, and with whom to have children. And in the case of third world women, how many children to bear and how close together.
These are basic human rights, but they have yet to be fully acknowledged, in large part because of the insistance of many well-intentioned people like yourself who believe that women should be constrained by law according to their reproductive capabilities.
Abortion IS a very sad procedure. But it is not as sad as all of the suffering of the already-born. If you were to redirect your outrage towards child abuse punishment and prevention, this country and this world would be so much the better for it.
Posted by Arcadia B on 04/23/2009 @ 11:11AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Your right, why continue to present my points to people who already have their mind made up that an unborn child doesn't feel pain and is not a child at all, just a ball of cells. At 23 weeks, the baby is not a little ball of cells. We are all made of cells, so how can a baby not be a baby just because they are not in the form they will be in a few months?
You can tell or show me whatever about a flying speghetti monster, but what does that have to do with abortion, or anything important for that matter? Even if there IS a possibility that the "ball of cells" can feel pain, that should make you think.
Again with the poooorrr mee. I had to go through labor and those pains were horrible blah blah blah. Get over it. Everyone does it, it is part of life. And if you didn't want to, then you shouldn't have gotten pregnant. Your labor pains were worse than a terminated child's.. ummm doubt it. Don't recall the procedure of labor including any sucking off of any of your body parts and then crushing your skull and sucking it out a uterous.
You don't abondon people? Oh, that's right.. you would rather just kill it so you don't have to think or worry about it.
The reason there are so many populating this earth is in part by people who have 10+ kids and then their kids have kids and so on and so on.
If I couldn't have children myself, I would absolutely adopt.. and since my Husband is not white, I would adopt a mulit-raced child. They are cuter anyways. And I will not be having anymore children, and I will make sure I don't get pregnant.
Have a great life and keep telling yourself you didn't murder your child because he/she couldn't feel pain.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/23/2009 @ 11:00AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jessica, I'm curious: do you celebrate birthdays, or conceptiondays?
When a woman miscarries, should she hold a funeral? Should the authorities investigate the cause of death of the fetus?
And since when are you not allowed to adopt if you're fertile? Fertile women can adopt. Even women who already have children can adopt. The reasons you give for not adopting are even dumber than the reasons you say we are giving for terminating a pregnancy. I can make my own babies too, but when I'm ready to start a family, I'm still going to adopt.
Maybe I should start campaigning for a law that makes all women make the same choices I will! Mandatory adoptions for all!
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/23/2009 @ 11:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jess, less than 1.5 percent of abortions are performed after 20 weeks. Almost 60 percent are done before 8 weeks. No wakes up at 20 weeks pregnant and says "hmmm, I don't think I want to be pregnant anymore, lets go have an abortion.".
While your beliefs are obviously very strong, they are highly uneducated. Your remarks prove that, with things like "The reason there are so many populating this earth is in part by people who have 10+ kids and then their kids have kids and so on and so on.". Tell that to the people in China with their 10 kids... oh wait, no one in China has 10 kids and yet they're over populated. Go figure.
And your comment " If I couldn't have children myself, I would absolutely adopt.. and since my Husband is not white, I would adopt a mulit-raced child. They are cuter anyways." First off, if you think adoption is the option for all these abortions the DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. I am so sick of people screaming "adoption adoption!" and then turning around and say "but its not for me, cause I can give birth to my own kids". Guess what, if you're going to insist that its the solution then you better be first in line to adopt those kids-and not just the "cute" ones, "ugly" babies need love too. Otherwise, you have no room to speak. As I said before, I've been there and done that, I have lived with a foster child and it was one of the most heartbreaking situations I have ever seen. Do you know what it's like to have a kid crying every night because his mother left him, because she wasn't ready to be a parent? Do you know what it's like to deal with the emotional backlash of a child who has phsyical and mental imparements because his mother couldn't bother to take care of her self while pregnant? No? I didn't think so.
I'm happy for your belief in god, but what do you think is better, a fetus returning to its maker that has not suffered the abuse of a care giver, or the child who must live the life of hell before he meets his maker again? Because sadly, there are too many people like YOU in this world who like to say adoption is the option but wont take part in the process.
You say "I will make sure I don't get pregnant", well honey let me tell you, the only way you can be POSITIVE that you wont get pregnant again is to get a hysterectomy or abstain until menopause, because birth control can fail, it happens to people all the time. God forbid you ever find yourself in that situation, and are faced with that choice, because you have NO IDEA what it's really like.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/23/2009 @ 12:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Actually, Elizabeth, the only 100% way to avoid pregnancy is going the hysterectomy route. A friend of mine was completely abstinent when she was raped (which, yes, resulted in a pregnancy. Which she aborted).
But then again, Jessica seems to be of the mindset that my friend, at the age of 12, should have fought harder against the grown man raping her, and just KEPT HER LEGS CROSSED. Because, after all, the woman -- er... or girl, whatever -- is responsible. Right?
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/23/2009 @ 01:29PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Your absolutely right Criss! I was a bit aggitated and when I was writing. Hell, they told me I'd NEVER have kids, I have a four year old that proves otherwise so even infertility can't keep you from getting knocked up, it seems ;).
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/23/2009 @ 05:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Wow Elizabeth, told you were infertile and then you were pregnant. Very interesting story.
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/23/2009 @ 06:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I had a doctor try and talk me into a hysterectomy at 19 to cover up a mistake he made during what should have been a routine d&c-he claimed tissue from a miscarriage ate a hole almost al the way through my uterus but what really happend was he botched it and almost took a hole out himself. Thank god I refused him but it wasn't until years later that I found out what really happened. They were right for 7 years, so imagine our shock when I was late one month. They thought I wouldn't be able to carry to term, but she stayed in until 38 weeks. Even suffering through that-and being infertile is a hell all in itself-I would never have told a woman she was wrong to have an abortion.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/23/2009 @ 06:24PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
QUOTE:
You don't abondon people? Oh, that's right.. you would rather just kill it so you don't have to think or worry about it.
You make a VERY gross assumption about me based on a paragraph you clearly didn't read all the way through. You're highly emotional, but you need to stop & think and understand what people are actually saying here.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/23/2009 @ 11:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It would seem as though Jessica is not acknowledging any of these very good arguments. She refers to my story as the pooooor me story, when in fact my labor pains were probably less painful than most and I also didn't use any pain killers and am very proud of my labor, the birth I gave and my children. The point is that she is putting the pain of ending a fetal life that has a underdeveloped everything and as Elizabeth pointed out, not able to survive without the mother above all other pains of human life and human suffering.
It is almost pointless to say anything else, because this person simply refuses to be wrong about anything. You don't go on discussion bords to be an ass to everyone who is ultimately spending their time to educate you on a different perspective, you go on to challenge a point with a willingness to be wrong. At least any one who really seeks the truth does. I may not always be right, though I will admit when someone point of view is more logical than mine. This is not the case. THIS IS A WOMEN'S RIGHT issue and you are saying trivial things like ,"ummm doubt it..., I would adopt a mulit-raced child. They are cuter anyways...so how can a baby not be a baby just because they are not in the form they will be in a few months?" These are just some examples of statements that discredit any of your good points.
You clearly are overlooking more valid points!
* Animal rights- Do you or your husband wear shoes? Got Nikes? Do you realize that most of these animals ARE skinned alive? This is a fact.
*Do you eat meat and fish?
*Unwanted children- abused by parents, abused far worse and extremely more abuses in foster care and orphaniges.
*Poverty- extreme poverty in many places is due to rise in population as a result there has been an increase in human trafficking.
*slavery, there are more slaves today than any time in history castla.org freetheslaves.net acrimesomonstrous.com
*Global warming- consumption of natural resources is increasing and likely will since so mny people are not WILLING TO CHANGE THEIR WAYS and would rather wait for a book's prophecy of the end of the world to claim everyone than to protect our Earth. This problem will grow into major catastrophies if population increases
* Food and water scarcity- look it up. Many countries do not have access to clean water as we do and their children are dying and starving at alarming rates as a result. It is much worse to watch your own child die from dehydration and starvation and be too poor to do anything but watch as opposed to have had an abortion. If you think other wise than you are the murderer, you are the killing and you are the opresser.
These are facts and they are proven. I don't have to tell you what I think because there is plenty more that I know.
A fetus is one with the mother, therefore as part of the mother it is her choice what to do with her own body.
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/23/2009 @ 06:05PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"Abortion IS a very sad procedure. But it is not as sad as all of the suffering of the already-born. If you were to redirect your outrage towards child abuse punishment and prevention, this country and this world would be so much the better for it."
I just stood up and applauded this. I see it everyday. I want to beg this strong "pro life" movement to redirect its tremendous passion to the living children who suffer everyday and are without uterus or stable home all together.
What good is it to insist a woman to have a child because of your beliefs on how there is no other humane choice and then be caring for your own child while this woman's child suffers abuse after abuse? How can this ever be a humane decision?
I think what disturbs me most about Jessica's posts is that she is a woman and yet she is not for the rights and freedoms of all women. She can't get past the inhumanity in abortion to see that pregnancy and a woman's body is far too often used against her. Women have been being controlled for their bodies and having their bodies abused by society for far too long and, as can be seen in Jessica's posts, the abuse is dolled out by both women and men.
I know many of us have experience with or have seen cultural practices or customs that are created for the sole purpose of garnering control over a woman's body.
I fight for the rights of all women and their bodies. It is not my body, not my consequences, so it is not my choice. I fight for the rights and care of all living children too. They are too young to understand that they are deserving and should be valued so that they can in turn make better choices.
For me, it is all about caring authentically for humanity with as little judgement as possible and as much empathy as possible. It is all about choice.
Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 04/23/2009 @ 09:53PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thanks.
And with all the human pain and suffering, why cause more.
Obviously you don't enjoy sex, because you keep demanding "It is ok for women to like sex". And that is fine, but you don't need to have an abortion to enjoy sex. As a matter of fact, maybe you would enjoy sex, if you had it with someone responsible and didn't have to worry about what would happen if you did become pregnant, because you would know everything would be ok.
That is a horrible thing that happened to your friend, and is something she should not have to worry about at her age, but that child was half of her. Yes, it was half of the rapist, but something great could have been in store for them. Maybe that child was destined to find the cure for cancer, or some other disease that we know nothing about yet, but we will never know that child's potential.. because he/she was murdered before he/she ever had a chance.
Lisa, I did read all the way through. You didn't say you had an adoption, but you are supporting it.. so therefore you are supporting those who had abortions just because of their own selfishness to not feel the pain and sorrow of giving up their child for adoption.
Criss, why would we hold a funeral for a baby that died through miscarriage? That was natures natural coarse. We are not talking about that. We are talking about the CHOICE to kill. My friend had a miscarriage, and she was devastated. And then to know you people who were pregnant and just choose to kill it so easily, while others who want to have a child, loses it.
As for adopting, I will consider that in the future. Not right now, because I know I am only financially stable for one. I had a horrible experience with pregnancy. Went to the hospital one morning with chest pain and they rushed me to the next city where they had a NICU and told me I would have to have a c-section at 31 weeks. I was devastated, scared, sad. I was steroids twice so my Daughter's lungs would mature a little. I was constantly being stuck with needles, every few hours, so they could check my blood. I was given magnesium sulfate which made me totally disoriented. It was a miserable, horrible experience. My Daughter was in the hospital NICU for 46 days before she was released at 4lbs. 1oz. She was strong, and she fought to be here. She had a bleed in her brain, and a hemangioma. She is the sweetest thing in the world and I wouldn't change all that. I still don't believe in abortion. God will only bring you to what you can handle. It is God's decision for a human to be here, not a humans. My Mother divorced my Father when I was 4. She later remarried and had a son. She just recently told me, that she had become pregnant again after my brother was born. My Step-Dad cheated on her while she was pregnant with my brother. She knew having another child with him would be tragic, SO SHE PRAYED TO GOD. She asked my Step-Dad to do the same. She later had a miscarriage. That was God's choice, not hers. She knew that.
I agree that if a woman wants an abortion, they should do it themselves. It being legal is like allowing cocaine to be legal. It isn't, but people still do it. If abortions weren't legal, people would still do it.. but they would have to deal with the consequences just as a cocaine addict would.
I think all of you who are so worried about women's rights (regarding abortion) have had some bad experiences with men. Yes, there are MANY horrible men in this world who lie, cheat, abuse, rape, etc., etc. but you are joining that group by allowing abortions.
I am not saying women shouldn't have rights. After all, I am a woman. I don't feel that men and woman in America have less oppertunity than the other. They all have the same oppertunity to go to school, have families, good careers, etc. It is what they choose to do with those oppertunities. We should have even pay rates. It shouldn't be men getting more money. After all, look at all the many single Mom's raising children by themselves. It should be equal or more in favor of women. A child does not mean doom for everyones life. There are many mothers (young) who still raise their kids in a loving home, go to work, pay the bills. It is what you make of it.
Posted by Jessica Carmona on 04/24/2009 @ 07:17PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It's ok to pray that god kill a fetus but not to get an abortion?Does't god know everything thats going to happen anyways? Why on earth would god induce a miscarriage to a woman who didn't want her fetus but wag the finger at the lady who takes matters into her own hands?
Ever hear this? There was a man who was drowning. And a boat came and the man on the boat said, "Do you need help?" And the man said, "God will save me." Then another boat came and he tried to help him, but he said, "God will save me." Then he drowned and went to Heaven. Then the man told God, "God, why didn't you save me?" And God said, "I sent you two boats, you dummy, why didn't you get in one!"
Also, your contradicting statements of men and women having equal opportunities, and then turning around and saying you think women should get equal pay because they obviously don't. Which is it you believe-we're all equals in opportunity, or women are obviously getting the shaft? You can't have it both ways.
Jessica, I do not believe you are reading what you write. I could sit here and pick apart your post, but really, what would accomplish? Nothing. We're all in agreement though that you wont be having any abortions any time soon and for that we're all so happy for you. In the meantime, please sit down and do some research on womens sufferage-knowledge is power.
Posted by Elizabeth Musser on 04/24/2009 @ 09:21PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Elizabeth,
Excellently put! I often use that story myself as an example. GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELP THEMSELVES, after all.
Jessica, do you know what a funeral is? People who die of natural causes have funerals. For example, my father-in-law died of lung cancer a few years ago -- natural causes (he was not a smoker, btw). But we had a funeral for him. BECAUSE HE WAS A HUMAN BEING, a PERSON. A good friend of mine had a miscarriage earlier this year. She didn't even get excused from her classes for that semester at school. BECAUSE A FETUS IS NOT A PERSON. Not until it is BORN.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me if you celebrate your daughter's birthday or if you celebrate her conceptionday.
As for the rest of your post... *sigh* You're just yelling and throwing stones. You don't even care where or at whom you're throwing them, so I've stopped listening. (Unless you're going to answer my questions.)
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/24/2009 @ 09:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Again, Jessica, you make a lot of assumptions about people here who you don't know personally. I'd rather debate the abortion issue than defend my character to someone who doesn't know me.
In general, my view on life is that until I walk a mile in someone else's shoes, I have no business telling them how to live their life.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 04/24/2009 @ 08:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Like the rest of my friends here, you post is such a rant and tanget that I can not even give it its credit. Let me just post what a friend of mine said:
If men had to bear children ... you can bet your life that all forms of birth control would be legal, even required!!! hahahah (my friend is a guy ...)
Posted by Margaret Free on 04/25/2009 @ 06:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Why didn't Maggie just get up and leave?
That's my question.
I mean she was the one that sat there and listened to it.
I agree people shouldn't be shoved in a corner for they way they live their lives.
Not everyone is the same religion so there should be no laws made on religion.
I hear this a lot from feminists when men ask why we shouldn't get a say in Abortion just as much of the women. They say if we didn't want a child we would use protection or not have sex in the first place.
Well what about women?
Pregnancy can happen at all when you are chosing to have sex. So if you aren't ready for a child and all that and it's going to be THAT much of a horrible thing at that time in your life then why don't you just chose not to participate in the activity that can produce a child?
Posted by Connor D. on 04/28/2009 @ 10:48AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Connor,
There are many reasons why Maggie, or any other woman in that situation, would not feel comfortable getting up and leaving. The whole point of those lectures is to intimidate the woman, scare and shame her into making the choice those people are imposing on her.
Men do get a say in abortion. You choose who you sleep with. If you would not be comfortable with me aborting our unplanned pregnancy, then don't have sex with me.
Once you make the choice to have sex with a woman, you have forfeited your vote, and the decision, to her. Because it's her body, not yours, that has to go through it (whichever choice she makes).
Look, I don't want to get in a plane crash. I would guess a plane crash would be a terribly unpleasant experience. You know what is the only 100% way to avoid being in a place crash? Never, ever getting on a plane, or choosing "not to participate in the activity that can produce a [plane crash]."
So, when a plane crashes, do the people on that plane deserve to die? Should we refuse them medical service, because they were irresponsible enough to get on that plane in the first place? They must have wanted to get in a plane crash, if they were going around flying all over the place!
What about car wrecks? If you stay off the streets, you won't get hit by a car. Why do so many people choose to participate in driving? What reckless, irresponsible people!
There's a reason God created birth control. There are many reasons why God created doctors, and led them to the medical advances that allow a woman to safely terminate a pregnancy. Every woman has a right to unbiased, medically accurate information about her choices, before and after sex.
Posted by Criss Cox on 04/28/2009 @ 11:28AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
First of all, Avenues is not state or federal funded, they receive all of their money through donations, and most of the people who work there are volunteers. They provide many great FREE services, such as free clothing and supplies, referrals to doctors and employment assistance, along with referrals to adoption agencies. They merely share Christ with these women, as it is their ministry to do so. They do not trick anybody, and I am sick of people's persecution of Christians.
Posted by Marie Shuster on 08/31/2009 @ 12:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have stated the facts. And I do have a right to be offended by your namecalling, instead of having the intelligence to converse like a civilized human being, you consider it acceptable to become very disrespectful. Instead of stating anything intelligence, your reference to me as a "Goddamn idiot" is the best you can do? Christians are being persecuted in this country, we have a right to our religious beliefs just as anyone does. Get your facts straight about paying zero taxes either, how typical.
Posted by Marie Shuster on 08/31/2009 @ 06:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Marie,
This country is run by Christians. We pledge allegiance to the flag using (the Christian) God's name, we have "In God We Trust" emblazoned on our money, and we have Christian values dictating what students can and cannot learn in school (abstinence-only "education," creationism/intelligent design). You cannot say Christians are being persecuted, because it is simply not true.
It is also disrespectful to the Christians who were persecuted, way back in the day, and had to hide from the law and hold mass in secret places, knowing they would be killed if they were discovered. I am a Christian, and I go to church with no problems on Sunday and even during the week; the Baptist church by my house even has policemen guiding traffic into the church. There is no religious perecution, especially not of Christians.
If you feel people say mean things about Christians, then you are free to express that opinion, but there is a huge difference between people expressing an opinion about the extreme religious right and that brand of "Christian", and persecution.
Posted by Criss Cox on 08/31/2009 @ 08:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.