Senate Begins Debate on Health Care: Eschews Stupak, Funds Abstinence

categories: Government And Policy, Womens Health

Published November 21, 2009 @ 10:20AM PT

Debate on the Senate version of the Health Care bill opened today with a mixed bag for those concerned about reproductive health.

On the plus side, the Senate Bill avoids Stupak language, instead offering private insurance a separate means by which it can set aside monies that could be used in case of abortion that do not interfere with government spending.

RH Reality Check reports that this approach "closely mirrors the Capps language which was originally included in the House and Senate Finance Committee bills, with an additional provision stating that the HHS Secretary must ensure that no federal funds are used for abortion." Additionally, in each State Exchange, where the uninsured will go to buy their insurance, there must be one plan available that provides abortion coverage beyond Hyde permissions, and one that plan does not.

Kasie Hunt at Congress Daily reports that this is an important safeguard, which "will make sure that an insurance company always has enough strictly private money to cover any abortion services its enrollees claim."

Despite avoiding Stupak language and resolves a lot of the problems of "preexisting conditions," there's one major caveat to support for this version of the bill by supporters of reproductive health. As Newsweek reports, the Senate bill will revive the Title V program, which had provided $50 million per year for abstinence-only education since the 90s -- a move that will ultimately lead to more unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.

In a final twist, new government guidelines on mammograms and pap smears released this week recommend that these life-saving exams should now be started later in a woman's life, at age 50 and 30 respectively. The new guidelines being proposed are setting up what Air America calls a "booby trap" in the Health Care debate by derailing discussion of the bill and steering them to these new recommendations.

Photo: Flickr, Center for American Progress

Spread the Word

More You Can Do

Get action and news alerts about Women's Rights »
Browse top Women's Rights organizations to support »
Find out more about Women's Rights and what you can do to help »

Comments (2)

Personally, I think is ridiculous to deny young women comprehensive knowledge about pregnancy prevention and reproductive health and then, when they find themselves with an unintended pregnancy, want to limit their choices. You can't withhold information from somone and then punish them for making an uniformed choice. They are setting women up to fail.

Posted by Roxann MtJoy on 11/22/2009 @ 12:07PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
Reply to thread
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Roxann
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
I agree with Roxann.

It upsets me that there are people out there who want to FORCE women into going through 9 months of pregnancy, pain, stress, hormone changes, and hours of labor, just to satisfy a stranger's misguided sense of morality. But it's perfectly OK to have an abortion and avoid all this trauma IF you were raped or pregnant due to incest. What about that whole "all life is sacred" thing? I guess it's only sacred as long as it wasn't made out of force or incest. But I digress.

Posted by Gabrielle B on 11/30/2009 @ 09:11PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Gabrielle
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Jen Nedeau is a social media consultant, progressive activist, feminist speaker and writer. She currently lives in New York City, where she works full-time as the Director of Digital Strategy at Air America Media. Additionally, Nedeau volunteers as the Chief Technology Officer for New Leaders Council, a non-profit that offers exclusive training for young leaders. You can follow her on Twitter @HumanFolly or learn more here: www.jennedeau.com.