Is Feminism Dead? An Overview of Post-Feminism
Published October 04, 2008 @ 04:21PM PT
To believe in a post-feminism era is, in essence, to believe that feminism is dead.
Some say that they are post-feminists because they believe the concept of feminism is irrelevant in society where gender inequality isn't a modern-day problem. And, by proxy, they are also saying that feminism has achieved its goals and now it is time to distance themselves from the movement.
Some call themselves post-feminist because they believe in taking charge of their own success - economic, political, and sexual power - without admitting to any kind of glass ceiling, which is the sort of power feminism that Naomi Wolf details in her book Fire with Fire. Still, regardless of admitting there is or is not a glass ceiling, removing oneself from the collective women's rights movement can also mean unwittingly engaging in the post-feminist movement.
Some see the "f-word" as something "dangerous and profane, an explosive term - angry, unfeminine women use to identify themselves" as Rory Dicker puts it. These descriptors have created a stigma against feminism. While many women believe in the proponents of feminism - equality in society - they still shy away from the feminism tag and instead subscribe to the concept of post-feminism. In this case, being post-feminist is an attempt to avoid the stigma of the word, regardless of whether or not one sees society is being fair and just for all women.
A major component of the contemporary feminist movement is to engage in consciousness-raising (CR) efforts. As written about in the book Manifesta by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, "CR was designed to be a radicalizing process, a way of spurring women to change the world and of transforming the personal into the political." Believing in post-feminism and saying that there is no need for future efforts within the women's movement serves to thwart CR efforts and can in effect further gender discrimination rather than lessen it. Whether you consider yourself a first, second, or third wave feminist, all feminists agree that having a dialogue about women's rights, while also honoring past lessons and achievements, is essential to future success. By saying that feminism is dead and the women's rights movement is no longer necessary, post-feminists choose to silence consciousness-raising efforts.
Origin of the term
One of the earliest uses of the term "post-feminism" was in Susan Bolotin's 1982 article "Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation," published in 1982 in New York Times Magazine, in which it was used to describe a backlash against second-wave feminism. Meanwhile, some contemporary feminists, such as Katha Pollitt or Nadine Strossen, consider feminism to hold simply that "women are people". Their view is that feminism serves to divide the sexes rather than unite them, and by centering efforts around a specific gender, the efforts of the women's rights movement are in fact sexist rather than feminist.
In her 1994 book Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women, Christina Hoff Summers reports that the modern academic feminist theory, as well as the women's rights movement are gynocentric and misandrist because in her point of view, neither call for men and women to work together toward equality, but rather for women to work against men. She labels this "gender feminism" and proposes the idea of "equity feminism" instead, which aims for full civil and legal equality of men and women from all backgrounds. She argues that gender feminists advocate preferential treatment and portray women as victims, while equity feminism provides a more viable alternative form of feminism that focuses on equality and results. These descriptions and other work have caused Hoff Sommers to be described as an antifeminist by some other feminists.
Backlash
No matter what form it takes, however, one thing is clear: the post-feminist movement is in many respects a formalized backlash against feminism. The unfortunate thing is that the concept of post-feminism is appealing to women who don't realize its damaging effect. To many, the rise of post-feminism signals a world "in which feminism has been transcended, occluded, overcome," but to others it is still clear that there's work to do.
In a world where women still have yet to achieve equal pay for equal work, still face sexual violence, still lack equal representation in government, business and higher education, still try to meet impossible beauty standards, still lack access to affordable health care - it is impossible to say that feminism is dead. To do so would in essence reverse historical efforts with the false veil of present day gender equality.
Unfortunately, pretending that there is equality when in fact it has yet to be achieved is one of the worst things a woman can do for the future of the women's rights movement.
Perhaps it is time to say post-feminism is dead and feminism lives on.
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (7)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Jen Nedeau is a social media consultant, progressive activist, feminist speaker and writer. She currently lives in New York City, where she works full-time as the Director of Digital Strategy at Air America Media. In August 2008, Nedeau was selected to be the Editor of the WomensRights.Change.Org where she facilitates daily discussion about the feminist movement. Additionally, Nedeau volunteers as the Chief Technology Officer for New Leaders Council, a non-profit that offers exclusive training for young leaders. You can follow her on Twitter @HumanFolly or learn more here: www.jennedeau.com.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















That is so true. Even in developed countries there still are so many problems that women face, although feminism has brought a lot to the. But why do these women close their eyes before women from other cultures? There is so much that feminism still has to do, we cannot lower our voices now.
Posted by Agne Serp. on 11/18/2008 @ 01:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I happen to be anti-feminist.
Feminism has only promoted women to effectively fight men in their own spheres that have been theirs since time immemorial. Western men and women are aligning against each other in a way that has not ever occured in known history.
There are some total absurdities. Women are more inclined towards the arts - and so as might be expected there are more women VOLUNTARILY applying for teaching/arts/writing and other creative spheres. Well and good. But wait - gender difference... and it will never end. If there are, say, 15000 applications to an engineering degree and 12000 are male (quite realistic) and we suddenly need to get 50-50 then this means PERMANENTLY discriminating against men. And they HATE it. One of my previous boyfriends (who I now miss bitterly) very much changed my tune on this subject. In fact, it is quite seemly to raise children in a natural, womanly capacity while an honourable husband works hard to supply the family's fundamental needs. Having a weak or badly raised/conflicted family reflects as badly on the husband as the wife. He was the greatest man I have ever known and left me at the moment we hit the feminism topic. A very, very sad and deeply regrettible moment for me.
Posted by Lena Nesterov on 01/31/2009 @ 07:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Travel the world look at the statistics on violence against women, rape and sex slavery and tell me again why you are anti-feminist.I'm sorry it just baffles me that people don't acknowledge that there is obviously some issues facing women and feminism aims at helping stand against these things as well as helping men out. Both genders are in this box and if they step outside of it then they are abnormal... women are sex objects in thissociety and men must not cry, they must be tough and make the majority of the money... if they don't in many cases the feel that they are failing their families in some way. And if women do not adhere to the beauty standards they too often feel worthless and like failures. Feminism also fights against this. We ask only to be treated as equals and we also aim to create more realistic demands on men. I just do not understand anti-feminism.
Posted by Ashley Chapman on 06/09/2009 @ 10:22AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Where is feminism period? I was there for the first round in the seventies. Much of that work and its results seem to have disappeared. Look in any fashion magazine today and see the newest tiniest bikini bottoms ever made. Why not just replace these with clear plastic bandages. Now women can starve and reshape themselves down to their pubic bones to wear these stupid suits. And they can pair them up with their new five inch heels. Weren't these sorts of shoes usually associated with pornographic material. And just everyone alive is now claiming to deliver oral sex to strangers. Weren't those the crack ho's that did that. You call this liberation? It sound more like sixth world country slavery. did anyone catch the Miss USA contest and the air-headed answers given by the bikini wearing five inch heel girls. One of the judges said she took her job seriously as she was going to pick the woman to represent American women - in five inch heels. You do not represent me at all, post feminism, third wave, or more appropriately head under water, whatever you want to call it, appears to be by the dumb for the dumb. There is no self respect and without that there can be nothing else.
Posted by pat dri on 04/22/2009 @ 09:33AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
People like those who wrote this article are the reason feminism should be dead. Instead of trying to get women to change, you should be focusing on the male side of the fight.
There is no way for enough change to happen in society in a single generation to give every women rights.
And instead of fighting against air-headed models, or against a women that wants to become a nurse, you should be attempting to change the minds of people.
Telling poeple what's wrong and right will not change their oppinions or personalities, and its those that control their actions.
So what you should be trying to do is to raise your sons and daughters with a sense of EQUALITY.
Posted by John Warren on 05/08/2009 @ 07:38AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I didn't have any sons or daughters. Didn't want to fall into the mommy trap as I could see I would have one job at work, and several at home - would be even more tied down rather than liberated trying to have it all - which you can't do unless you have help - like men have help to take care of everything at home while they pursue their careers. Since men don't listen anyway, it is up to the women to wise up and stop allowing themselves to be used and degraded.
Posted by pat dri on 05/13/2009 @ 01:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree we should raise our children with a sense of Equality and most feminist if not all would agree with you! However i do also think we can try and speak out against the present inequality.
Posted by Ashley Chapman on 06/09/2009 @ 10:25AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.