Happy Birthday, Title IX
Published June 23, 2009 @ 07:05AM PT
Today is the 47th Anniversary of Title IX, arguably one of the most important pieces of legislature regarding women's rights. Though for many, mention of the act conjures images of female athletes, Title IX banned gender discrimination from all education programs and extracurricular activities in federally funded schools and school programs. In honor of this anniversary, I encourage you to learn more about the Act, and the legislation arising from it.
For starters, some quick facts:
Full Name: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, or The Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act
Date Enacted: June 23, 1972
The Gist: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be
- excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be
- subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
Areas covered: All educational and school programs and activities that receive federal funds. This can include academics, access to school-related healthcare services, dormitory facilities, school-related athletics, school-related activities and clubs, assignment to classrooms, employment policies, treatment of teen parents, and standardized testing.
Areas not covered: Social fraternities and sororities, sex-specific youth clubs (such as Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts)
The Results: Before Title IX, women made up only 2% of college athletes. In 2001, 43% of college athletes were women. Likewise, before Title IX, women made up only 7% of high school athletes. In 2001, 41.5% of high school athletes were women.
Before Title IX, 42% of college students were women. During the 2003-2004 school year, 57% of college students were women.
Title IX in Court: Title IX has frequently been challenged in court, but the Supreme Court has upheld the act and even expanded its reach. In 1992, the Supreme Court ruled in Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools that students who are victims of sexual harassment and discrimination could be rewarded monetary damages. In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education that Title IX prevents schools from retaliating against individuals who protest gender discrimination.
For those who are legal-minded, the full text of the statute can be found here.
For some interesting statistics, check out the Feminist Majority Foundation's Title IX Fact Page.
To keep up to date with the latest cases arising from Title IX and for some interesting and timely discussion regarding the act, be sure to visit the Title IX Blog.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Update: Caster Semenya Gets Strip Searched Inside & Out
-
Female Athletes On Twitter
-
Saudi Girls Make Traction Toward Equality On the Athletic Field
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















This was a landmark in womens' rights. Because of it I suppose, My daughter was allowed to play soccer on a team with both genders. and I must say the girls dominated the team. My daughter would take the ball from boys twice Her size, and before They knew it was gone, She would pass it to Caitlin, Who would would put into the goal! They were unstoppable!
Posted by Charlie Reed on 06/23/2009 @ 07:49AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I am supportive of womens' sports, however, let's think about the Providence College mens' baseball team. About 10-15 years ago, the Providence College mens' baseball qualified for the NCAA. However, the program was abolished after that accomplishment. The reason? Since Providence College could not get enough women to play softball, under Title IX, in order "to be fair", they had to scrape the mens's baseball team. Colleges do not have the opportunity to donate money/equipment/resources to support womens' sports in another capacity so that they can continue a successful mens' program.
Posted by Richard Forrest on 06/24/2009 @ 02:11PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sounds more like politics than a legal issue to me.
Posted by Thomas McHugh on 06/30/2009 @ 09:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Im glad it passed...I live for the day that were all equal no matter what our gender or sexual orientation.
Posted by Thomas McHugh on 06/30/2009 @ 09:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.