Women's Rights

Finding the Feminism In Motherhood

Published May 24, 2009 @ 07:58AM PT

When we talk about women, we are often talking about mothers since 53.5% of women are mothers, they are on average around age 40 and 80% of women have children.

The discussion ranges from how influential they are in the market (very) - women comprise over 50% of the population, make over 80% of household purchasing decisions, and are expected to control 60% of all wealth by 2010 - to how influential they are in society (inadequate). Women CEOs equal a mere 15.7% in 2008 despite earning six out of 10 college degrees and making up 59% of the workforce.

But, what is a mom blogger? Is she a mother who blogs about any topic, or a mother who blogs mainly about parenting topics? Elisa Camahort Page, co-founder and COO of BlogHer, asked this question when I queried her about specific results of The 2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners. I responded that I believed "mom blogger" describes a blogger who self-identifies as a mother mainly writing about parenting.

That distinction makes a big difference. How we define and think of mom bloggers and moms who blog might explain the perceived gap between mom bloggers and feminists, for example, and it might even explain the perception of moms who blog, whether about parenting or any topic.

Here's what the The 2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners found (see methodology here):

Education level:

  • 77% some college and beyond
  • High school graduate or less: 16.8%
  • Technical or trade school: 9.3%
  • Some college/university: 39.1%
  • Graduated from college/university: 25.5%
  • Some post-graduate work: 3.1%
  • Masters or Doctorate degree: 6.2%

Employment: 34% are solely SAHM:

  • Employed full-time: 32.3%
  • Employed part-time: 12.4%
  • Managing my own business: 8.1%
  • Managing my household: 34.2%
  • Retired: 3.1%
  • Student: 9.9%

Income level:

  • Under $25K: 15.5%
  • $25K-$34,999: 19.3%
  • $35K-$49,999: 19.3%
  • $50K-$74,999: 24.2%
  • $75K-$99,999: 8.7%
  • $100K-$124,999: 7.5%
  • Greater than $125K: 5.6%

** General Population respondents who are both moms and who blog (any subject)

** Sample size=161

In short, moms who blog are well-educated, most are middle class, and only about a third are solely stay at home - middle of the bell curve for the population. In other words, it is the broadest and most diverse group.

So why are there so many homogenizing assumptions about the group?

I theorize it's the word mom. We hear that word and instantly think of our negative and reductive media induced stereotype of a woman who is raising children and our own personal prejudice. With this combination, it's hard to perceive moms beyond their parenting role and as a respect-worthy "professional."

As a result, anything prefaced with "mom" isn't likely to garner necessary support. Nevertheless, the feminist movement continues to frame issues that are, truly, "all of us issues" as "mom" or "women's" issues. Necessary ownership has migrated to marginalization. Consider fair pay. While framed as a women's issue, this has achieved a high-degree of opposition. However, when women are not receiving equal pay for equal work - regardless of why - it hurts these women personally, but it also harms society at large. Single mothers are three times more likely than men to be single income earners and they also overwhelm the lower earning quintiles, making them the largest at-risk group for public assistance (especially mothers).

It shouldn't need to be said, but clearly it must be: when women are harmed, we're all harmed.

Unfortunately, the women's movement hasn't succeeded in convincing enough men and women that these issues do affect us all and are essential to reform. Further, although many women do frequently work to improve conditions for women and children - whether as volunteers in Planned Parenthood clinics, on the PTA to improve education, or anywhere else - many are reluctant to identify themselves as feminist. We've been conditioned - by both sides - to see many roles as mutually exclusive from feminism.

It's clear that feminism has a PR problem. It's clear that women have a PR problem.

And that might very well be the actual gap.

The old maxims of "strength in numbers" and "divide and conquer" are definitely applicable here. Feminism needs to broaden its concept to acknowledge and value all contributions by all individuals who are working to improve the status of women, even if those efforts don't come under the auspice of the feminist flag. Women, especially mothers, need to appreciate that feminism is effort designed to improve quality of life for everyone by advancing the status of women.

I'd love to see more equitable representation of women in power positions, better media coverage of women and their efforts, a complete drop of the "Madonna" or "whore" black and white coverage of mothers in the media, and a better perception of the word mom and feminist.

Maybe then we can better see and appreciate that so many of us are working towards the same goals. Admittedly, right now, we're doing more parallel play versus interactive play, but that doesn't mean a total disconnect. There is a great deal of cross-over - it simply needs better publicity.

To that end, the MOMocrats and Fem 2.0 are joining to host a live chat: Fem2.0 Twittercast: Feminism is Where You Are/What You Do.

MOMocrat Cynematic wrote, "No matter where we are in our respective life cycles...if you're a feminist, you've probably brought that sensibility with you to your activism...Let's move off labels, identities, and the preconceptions that can come attached to those. Let's find as many different feminisms as we can through the kinds of way it's practiced."

We hope you'll join in.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (4)

  1. Elisa Camahort Page

    Nice article Julie. I was just talking with a fellow child-free blogger last night about how so many "all of us" issues" are being painted as mom issues...alienating those of us who are not moms.
    On a similar note, something I brought up at the Fem 2.0 conference in February was that some feminist "all of us" issues are painted as liberal-only issues, alienating women who might not self-identify as liberal, but certainly believe in many feminist principles.
    Are we, as feminists, willing to encourage their support on those issues, even if we violently disagree with them on other issues (oh, let's say choice, as an example). I think we must.
    Often say: Women are not some monolithic bloc who think...or vote...alike, but we can leverage common ground where it exists.
    I do have a question about the stats in your first paragraph. You say:
     53.5% of women are mothers
    and
    80% of women have children
    I don't understand how those two stats co-exist?
    Thanks for clarifying!

    Posted by Elisa Camahort Page on 05/24/2009 @ 09:48AM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Julie Pippert

    Hi Elisa,

    I see how the stats ended up confusing.

    Here's a clarification:

    Across all US women 53.5% are mothers
    At age 40 specifically, 80% of US women are mothers

    So the first stat is broad, and the second very narrow and specific about women aged 40.

    Yes, i see the way labels draw people who self-identify specifically, but obviously I agree that they can be really alienating, as well I think that's the key.

    Its a whole other article...but I think it's important to discuss how we relate to people even with whom we differ on key issues.

    I hint around this with my idea of conditioned to believe that feminism is mutually exclusive from many roles.

    I cut from this article some ideas about living in a very conservative area with many women who verbally disassociate from politics and feminism, but whom I see incorporating many of these ideas into rearing their chilldren.

    That's because I want to develop my thoughts on this more fully, which means asking and considering the questions and points you pose.

    Thanks so much for your comment.

    Posted by Julie Pippert on 05/24/2009 @ 01:53PM PT

  4. Dana Seilhan

    I have to admit I'm coming dangerously close to disavowing the f word.  Not because I don't agree with the idea of equal rights for women, but because over and over I perceive the so-called "women's movement" as trying to make us men.  As in, there is a specific set of abilities, privileges, and behaviors which mainstream society overwhelmingly labels as "male" attributes, and I perceive that feminism is trying to force all us women into possessing/performing those attributes/privileges/behaviors because that's supposedly what "equality" means.

    The end result being that I as a SAHM am looked down upon both by the mainstream (especially antifeminists) AND by the feminist movement.  Like I didn't feel beleaguered enough.

    The thing is, I *like* my daughter as well as loving her.  I don't *want* to relegate her rearing to someone else.  I like home-centered living, I like homeschooling, I like family-centered life.  Feminism tells me I am wrong to like those things because it means I'm not "ambitious" enough.  Ambitious enough for what?  Is it just me or has anyone on the Left outside of the environmental movement bothered to figure out that this ambition crap is exactly what got the planet messed up to begin with?  We as a species weren't happy with the way things were and had to "improve" them when we didn't know what the hell we were doing.  We're still behaving that way.  And now women have to do it just as much as men do, or we're not "good enough."

    And I am not imagining this.  I see it over and over again.  It is not my interpretation.  I don't actually believe it's the whole movement doing it;  I say "feminism tells me this" and "feminism says that" to simplify the discussion.  There ARE feminisms that let me do what I do and appreciate me for what I do.  But they don't speak for the whole movement and they aren't the most visible.  And it's so stupid.  If I were getting paid nine bucks an hour for just the housework I do, I would be called a maid or a custodian, and NOW and various labor unions would fight for me.  If I were getting paid whatever the restaurants pay for cooking three squares a day, I'd be called a cook.  If I got the minimum wage for looking after a child and providing her education I'd be a preschool teacher.  I don't get paid for any of these things--but I still do them.  Who says I'm not working?  Where is my respect?

    Wasn't this what started the modern feminist movement (20c and later), anyway?  That anything a woman does is automatically considered "less," and that as a result women don't get pay and benefits for the work we most often do?

    My teeth even set on edge when I see childfrees talk about this stuff because nowadays they're part of the problem.  I work my a$$ off daily and they call me a "lazy fat moo" and complain about my child (in generic, abstract terms, not us specifically) because she's four and doesn't act like an adult yet and that kind of crap just piles on to the prejudice we already face.

    On top of that if you're a poor woman or a woman still in college or a single woman, feminism's answer to pregnancy under those circumstances is to declare that we're facing an "unwanted" or "unintended" pregnancy, that said pregnancy will "ruin" our lives, and that clearly we need an abortion now and better access to contraception later.  Regardless of how we feel about it.  Clearly we're martyrs and deluded and fundamentalists otherwise.

    These are the messages getting out there from YOUR ideological camp.  Like it or not.  This is what I see when I read feminist blogs and "reproductive rights" websites.

    I'm not about to run to the conservative camp, I just don't know where I belong anymore.  I have to depend on a man I don't even particularly like, because the alternatives aren't any better.  I'm not subjecting my daughter to a so-called "educational system" that will do its level best to turn her into an unquestioning, consumerist idiot.  I'm not fit to find employment anywhere that wouldn't exploit me and then dump me at the first sign of a bad economy (not that we aren't in one already).  Welfare is insufficient and soul-killing.  Medicaid is a joke, and good docs usually don't accept it.  Food stamps are often insufficient and I don't feel like having someone in the line behind me criticizing everything I put up on the conveyor belt at the grocery store.  You know?  What is there?  When you've even gotta find a sitter for your kids before you can attend a NGO meeting of any kind because God forbid the childfrees feel alienated when it's not even a normal human experience to have nothing but adults around you at all times... I don't know.  I don't feel like I really have a place in any of this.

    And don't even get me started about adoption issues, adoption being the other "solution" we're offered.  Just.  don't.  because... I will yell a lot.

    So.  There you go.  I can't be the only one feeling this way.

    Posted by Dana Seilhan on 05/25/2009 @ 12:54PM PT

  5. Juan Portillo

    I don't know if it helps, but the way I see feminism is as a way to make sure women are able to have a choice.

    You can choose to be a stay at home mom, and lead a very family-oriented life, and other women are equally in the right to choose to be ambitious and have a career, etc.  Ideally, feminism won't tell you that what you're doing is wrong, but they want to make sure women with other interests are able to pursue them without road blocks or obstacles that relate solely to their gender.

    Does that make sense?

    Now, I am a guy but I like to think I'm a feminist, and I do struggle with the idea of "equality".  In the past, I used to think it meant: "women and men have to be equal", and I probably made the mistake of looking down on women who chose a lifestyle other than that of the "ambitious" woman.  However, now I see where I was wrong, I was probably too excited about feminist ideas, and I have re-evaluated my position to that of "freedom of choice".

    Posted by Juan Portillo on 05/29/2009 @ 02:59PM PT

  6. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.